Genetic and Environmental Impact on Psychiatric and Neurological Disease

The burden of brain disease in Europe continues to rise.  Currently, more than one in three individuals in Europe suffers from a disorder of the brain.1  Brain diseases carry with them an estimated yearly economic burden of 789 billion Euro,2 placing a considerable burden on personal, social, and economic well-being. Globally, mental disorders account for a disproportionately large percentage of disability-adjusted life years (56.7%) followed by neurological disorders (28.6%),3 illustrating the deleterious effects these disorders place on the individual and society.  Efforts to reduce this burden have led to a multi-disciplinary collaboration between the neurosciences, sociologists, clinicians, and public health officials, with a particular focus on the interplay between genetics and the environment, often referred to as “nature versus nurture”, in the development of these diseases.

Gaining a better understanding of the causal risk factors associated with psychiatric and neurological disease may aid in efforts to prevent the development of these often disabling conditions and subsequently reduce this burden overall.

Dr. Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg addresses the need and potential approach one could undertake to better understand and potentially prevent the development of these disorders

 

References

  1. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;21(9):655-79.
  2. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011 Oct;21(10):718-79. 
  3. Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0116820. 
    A systematic literature review was conducted to assess prevalence data for various mental, neurological, and substance use disorders.  A Bayesian meta-regression tool was the used to assess the prevalence of these disorders aside years lived with disability (YLDs), years lost to mortality (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).  The researchers found that in 2010, mental, neurological and substance use disorders accounted for 10.4% of global DALYs, 2.3% of global YLLs and, 28.5% of global YLDs, making them the leading cause of YLDs. Mental disorders accounted for the largest proportion of DALYs (56.7%), followed by neurological disorders (28.6%) and substance use disorders (14.7%).
  4. Hayden EC. Is the $1,000 genome for real? Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/is-the-1-000-genome-for-real-1.14530. January 14, 2014.
  5. Caulfield T, Evans J, McGuire A, et al. Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate. PLoS Biol 2013;11(11):e1001699.
  6. Cooper B. Nature, nurture and mental disorder: old concepts in the new millennium. Br J Psychiatry 2001;178(Suppl. 40):91–101.
  7. Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 636-45.
  8. Nestler EJ. Genes and addiction. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 277-81.
  9. Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7(7):583-90.
  10. Tsuang MT, Bar JL, Stone WS, Faraone SV. Gene-environment interactions in mental disorders. World Psychiatry 2004;3(2):73-83.
  11. Uher R. Gene-environment interactions in severe mental illness. Front Psychiatry 2014;5:48. 
  12. Loy CT, Schofield PR, Turner AM, Kwok JB. Genetics of dementia. Lancet 2014;383(9919):828-40.
  13. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). Available at http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
  14. Singh GK, Siahpush M. Widening rural-urban disparities in life expectancy, U.S., 1969-2009. Am J Prev Med 2014;46(2):e19-29. 
  15. Weich S, Twigg L, Lewis G. Rural/non-rural differences in rates of common mental disorders in Britian: prospective multilevel cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:51-7.
  16. Penkalla AM, Kohler S. Urbanicity and mental health in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Mental Health 2014;9:163-77.
  17. Lewis G, David A, Andreasson S, Allebeck P (1992) Schizophrenia and city life. Lancet 1992;340:137-40.
    This study examined the association between place of upbringing and the incidence of schizophrenia using data from 49,000 males indexed in the Swedish National Register of Psychiatric Care. They found that the incidence of schizophrenia was 1.65 times higher among men brought up in cities than in those who had had a rural upbringing, even after adjusting for other, potentially confounding factors such as illicit drug use and family history of other psychiatric illnesses.
  18. Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB, Westergaard T et al. (1999) Effects of family history and place and season of birth on the risk of schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 1999;340:603-8.
  19. Vassos E, Pedersen CB, Murray RM, Collier DA, Lewis CM. Meta-analysis of the association of urbanicity with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2012;38(6):1118-23. 
  20. Krabbendam L, van Os J. Schizophrenia and urbanicity: a major environmental influence: conditional on genetic risk. Schizophr Bull 2005;31(4):795-9. 
  21. Lederbogen F, Kirsch P, Haddad L, et al. City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature 2011;474(7352):498-501. 
    In this study, the researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a sample of 32 individuals with both rural and urban upbringing to assess the neural impact of growing up in an urban environment on social stress processing.  They found that living in a city was associated with increased amygdala activity, whereas urban upbringing affected the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC), a key region for regulation of amygdala activity, negative affect and stress. The results of found in the sample of 32 individuals was replicated in separate samples of 23 and 24 individuals, respectively. This was the first study illustrating the link between living in an urban environment and the ability to process social stress.  It was also the first to suggest that brain regions differ in vulnerability to living in a city as a risk factor across the lifespan.
  22. Haddad L, Schäfer A, Streit F, Lederbogen F, Grimm O, Wüst S, Deuschle M, Kirsch P, Tost H, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Brain structure correlates of urban upbringing, an environmental risk factor for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2015;41(1):115-22.
  23. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Tost H. Neural mechanisms of social risk for psychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 2012;15(5):663-8. 
  24. Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, et al. The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. JAMA 2016;315(16):1750-66. 
    This study examined household income data in the United States alongside mortality data from death records in order to examine the relationship between income and life expectancy.  The researchers found that higher income was associated with greater longevity throughout the income distribution. They also found that inequality in life expectancy increased over time and that life expectancy for low-income individuals varied substantially across areas of the country.  Finally, they noted that differences in life expectancy were correlated with health behaviours and local area characteristics. 
  25. Gianaros PJ, Horenstein JA, Cohen S, et al. Perigenual anterior cingulate morphology covaries with perceived social standing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2007;2(3):161-73.
  26. Heinrichs M, Gaab J. Neuroendocrine mechanisms of stress and social interaction: implications for mental disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2007;20(2):158-162.
  27. Akdeniz C, Tost H, Streit F, et al. Neuroimaging evidence for a role of neural social stress processing in ethnic minority-associated environmental risk. JAMA Psychiatry 2014;71(6):672-80.
  28. Kanai R, Bahrami B, Roylance R, Rees G. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc Biol Sci 2012;279(1732):1327-34. 
  29. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7(7):e1000316.
    A meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of examining the role of social relationships on the risk of mortality.  A total of 148 studies were examined, noting that strong social relationships had a significant impact on decreasing the risk of mortality.  This association was most robust for complex measures of social integration (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.23) and lowest for binary indicators of residential status (living alone versus with others) (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44).  The researchers concluded that having strong social relationships have a comparable effect on the risk of mortality to better known risk factors, such as nicotine use or family substance abuse.
  30. United Nations. World population aging, 2015. United Nations Report. Available at http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf 
  31. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386(9995):743-800. 
  32. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2007;3:186-91.
    The purpose of this study was to forecast the global burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and evaluate the potential impact of interventions that delay disease onset or progression of the disease.  Using epidemiological studies of AD, the researchers noted that the global prevalence of AD was 26.6 million in 2006 and would quadruple by 2050, meaning that 1 in 85 persons worldwide will be living with AD. They concluded that improved therapies or preventative strategies leading to delays in the onset and progression of AD could significantly reduce the overall burden associated with AD.
  33. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 2013;80:1778-83.
  34. World Health Organization. Dementia: A Public Health Priority. 2012;1-112. 
  35. Galvin JE, Sadowsky CH; NINCDS-ADRDA. Practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of dementia J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:367-382.
  36. Kivipelto M, Mangialasche F. Alzheimer disease: To what extent can Alzheimer disease be prevented? Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10(10):552-3.
  37. Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol 2014;13(8):788-94. 
  38. Río J, Comabella M, Montalban X. Predicting responders to therapies for multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5(10):553-60.
  39. Van Cauwenberghe C, Van Broeckhoven C, Sleegers K. The genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease: clinical implications and perspectives. Genet Med 2016;18(5):421-30. 
  40. Hampel H, Frank R, Broich K, et al. Biomakres for Alzheimer’s disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9(7):560-74.
  41. Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12(3):292-323.
  42. Chiu HF, Brodaty H. Arguments against the biomarker-driven diagnosis of AD. Int Psychogeriatr 2013;25(2):177-81. 
  43. Shulman MB, Harkins K, Green RC, Karlawish J. Using AD biomarker research results for clinical care: a survey of ADNI investigators. Neurology 2013;81(13):1114-21.